A research paper is judged on three things: a question narrow enough to answer, sources that exist and say what you claim, and a method that fits the question. Most papers fail on one of them before the writing even starts.
Our researchers work the way a careful academic would — search strategy first, every source verified and logged, method justified — and hand you the evidence together with the paper.
Fill in the form — our expert responds within 15 minutes
Every research paper we write comes with a Source Pack: each reference found in an academic database, opened, checked and listed with its link. Here are three real entries from a sample psychology research paper.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| Reference used in the paper | Where our researcher found it | Link to open it | What we checked |
|---|---|---|---|
| Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. | Academic database, then publisher site | doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa | Exists · not retracted · supports the method claim |
| Page, M.J. et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71. | PubMed | doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 | Exists · current version · cited for review reporting |
| National Statistics Office Malta — the latest population release | NSO Malta website | nso.gov.mt | Official statistic · release date recorded |
Each entry also shows the page that supports the point in your research paper — so if your lecturer asks about a source, you can answer.
We don't only write from scratch, and we don't only review. Pick the help that matches your research paper — or combine more than one.
Best if: you have the brief or topic, but nothing written yet.
A full research paper written from a narrowed question, with a Source Pack.
Write My PaperBest if: part is written, but the method, results or discussion are missing.
The missing sections completed in your style, with every new source checked.
Finish My PaperBest if: it's written, but the language, flow or referencing needs work.
Clearer writing and fixed citations — your ideas and findings stay yours.
Edit My PaperBest if: it's finished, and you want an expert opinion first.
Every reference opened, the rubric checked, a Turnitin report and an honest grade band.
Review My PaperNot sure which one you need? Send what you have — we'll suggest the right option before you pay, and you can add another service later.
Research looks different in every discipline. You get a researcher from your field, working to its methods and citation style.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| Field | Common paper types | Methods & tools | Citation style |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health sciences & nursing | IMRaD reports, scoping reviews, audits | Surveys, PRISMA-style reviews, SPSS | Vancouver or APA 7 |
| Psychology | Experimental and survey reports | t-tests, ANOVA and regression in SPSS, R or JASP | APA 7 |
| Social sciences & education | Qualitative research papers | Interviews and thematic analysis in NVivo | Harvard or APA 7 |
| Business & economics | Case-based and mixed-methods papers | Surveys, secondary data, regression | Harvard |
| Computing & engineering | Technical and applied research papers | Experiments and benchmarking in Python or MATLAB | IEEE |
| Law | Doctrinal and comparative papers | Case and statute analysis | OSCOLA |
UM study-unit papers, MCAST applied research and GBS or LSC modules all follow your own brief. Writing a full dissertation or thesis? See our dissertation help or thesis help.
The way a careful researcher would — and every step is built on your assessment brief and marking rubric.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| Step | What the researcher does | What you receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 · Brief and rubric | Command words, scope and every criterion mapped | A short criteria map |
| 2 · Question | Topic narrowed to one answerable question | Two or three question options |
| 3 · Search strategy | Keywords, databases and inclusion rules set | A search log with the sources found |
| 4 · Screening | Retracted and predatory sources removed | A draft Source Pack for your approval |
| 5 · Analysis and argument | Method justified, results interpreted, sources critically compared | An outline, then the full paper |
| 6 · Referencing and integrity | Two-way citation audit and similarity check | A Turnitin report and notes you can explain |
From a blank page to a nervous final check before you press submit — order only the service you actually need.
For when you have a brief and a topic, but no draft yet.
Question, objectives, method and timeline your lecturer can approve.
Sources grouped by theme into an argument that finds the gap.
Design justified, and your own data analysed and written up.
For finished drafts: every reference opened, the rubric matched, a Turnitin report.
Your own manuscript reshaped to author guidelines, with help answering reviewers.
The same toolkit a university researcher uses — so your sources and your numbers stand up.
Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, JSTOR and Google Scholar, plus publisher sites for full text.
Reference lists built in Zotero, EndNote or Mendeley, in the style you need.
SPSS, R, JASP, NVivo, Python and Excel — always on your own data.
Retraction screening, predatory-journal screening and Turnitin.
AI-invented citations are now turning up even in published journals. Here is what lecturers check, and how each option holds up.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| What lecturers check | Research writing from us | AI-generated or cheap papers |
|---|---|---|
| Where sources come from | ✓ Academic databases and libraries | ✗ Generated from a prompt |
| Do the links open? | ✓ A DOI or library record for each | ✗ Dead links, wrong journals |
| Retracted or predatory journals | ✓ Screened before use | ✗ Not checked |
| In-text vs reference list | ✓ Audited both ways | ✗ Often mismatched |
| If your lecturer clicks a reference | ✓ It opens, and you can discuss it | ✗ It doesn't exist |
| Risk to your degree | ✓ Everything verifiable | ✗ A possible misconduct case |
Use our paper as a model to learn from, and follow your institution's rules on outside help, AI and authorship.
See how the question, evidence and argument fit together, then write your own submission.
UM expects declared AI use, and GBS publishes its own guidance on AI and good academic practice.
For journal submissions we edit and format your own research — we do not ghost-write papers for publication.
PhD researchers, matched to your field. Degree certificates and photo ID are checked before anyone joins.
From €48, in euro. The price depends on paper type, level, length and deadline — and stays fixed once you approve it.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| Research Paper Type | Academic Level | Starting From | Typical Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annotated Bibliography | Undergraduate / Master's | €48 | 3–6 Days |
| Short Research Paper | Undergraduate | €58 | 4–7 Days |
| Journal / Conference Formatting | Master's / PhD | €90 | 4–8 Days |
| Research Proposal | Undergraduate / Master's | €95 | 5–7 Days |
| Methodology Section | Master's / Research | €120 | 6–10 Days |
| Standalone Literature Review | Master's | €155 | 8–12 Days |
| Full Research Paper | Master's / PhD | €185 | 8–14 Days |
Half when you approve the question and outline, half on delivery.
Send it anyway. We check it is realistic and tell you honestly before you pay.
Pre-submission checks, citation audits and editing are quoted separately — send the file for a fixed price.
It did for Dana — her proposal went from 58% to 96% once the question was narrowed to something she could answer.
University of Malta · 3,000 words · Vancouver
Dana wanted to study "the effect of lifestyle on chronic disease in Malta". Her supervisor returned it twice with the same note about feasibility.
Her researcher narrowed it to physical activity in one defined age group in a single locality, with a matching cross-sectional design. The rewritten proposal scored 96% and was approved.
Students and researchers at UM, MCAST and GBS — initials only, always.
Straight answers on sources, databases, data and deadlines.
Yes. A researcher from your field writes it from a narrowed question, to your brief and rubric, with every source logged in a Source Pack.
Yes. You approve the question, the outline and a draft Source Pack before the full paper is written.
Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, JSTOR and Google Scholar, plus publisher sites and official statistics such as NSO Malta and Eurostat.
Search the exact title in Google Scholar or your library, open the DOI, and check the page actually supports your claim. Our Source Pack does this for every reference.
Yes. Every source is checked for retractions and against predatory-publisher warning signs before it goes into your paper.
Yes — in SPSS, R, JASP, NVivo, Python or Excel. You receive the output with the written results, and we never invent data.
Pick one group, one place and one time frame, and ask one measurable question. Narrowing is included in every order.
Yes. Every reference is opened, and invented ones are replaced with real sources. Declare AI use wherever your university requires it.
A pre-submission check will tell you: every reference opened, the rubric matched, a Turnitin report and an honest grade band.
Every paper is written from scratch by a person and comes with a Turnitin similarity report. We don't promise AI-detector scores, because no detector is reliable enough to promise.
Yes. Send the author guidelines and your manuscript is reshaped to them — the research and authorship stay yours.
Yes, and many students start there. Proposals are priced separately from the paper.
Yes. Our researchers use their own academic database access.
From €48 for an annotated bibliography, €58 for a short research paper and €185 for a full Master's or PhD-level paper. The price is fixed once you approve it.
Upload your brief, draft or data — within 15 minutes you get a narrowed question, a researcher from your field and a fixed price.
Source Pack included · 50% after the outline · 35% off with MALTA35