You stated the law correctly. The mark still came back in the fifties — "descriptive", "one-sided", "where is the authority?" In law, marks sit in the argument, not the rule.
Our law experts work from your question, reading list and marking criteria: the issues identified and ranked, a clear IRAC structure, real authorities and peer-reviewed commentary, critical analysis of both sides, OSCOLA referencing and academic integrity.
Fill in the form — our expert responds within 15 minutes
Every good answer starts before the first paragraph. Here is a short problem question — and the issues we would rank from it.
Maria agrees on WhatsApp1 to buy Joe's Fiat for €8,000 and pays a €500 deposit2. Before delivery, Joe sells the same car to Paul3, who knew nothing of Maria and drives it away. Maria had already paid €300 for transport4. Joe now says a WhatsApp chat is not a contract.Advise Maria.
Four issues, ranked by weight, before a single paragraph is written — and you approve the list first.
The same issue, answered two ways. Look at the fourth row — that is where most law marks are won or lost.
Typical feedback on the left: "descriptive". Every answer we write puts the other side's best argument before the conclusion.
Whether the page is blank or the answer is nearly done, pick the file that matches where you are.
A full model answer: issues ranked, IRAC applied, both sides argued, OSCOLA footnotes.
The missing issues and counter-arguments written in your structure and style.
Counter-arguments added, facts cut back, authorities pinpointed and corrected.
OSCOLA, word count with footnotes, authorities and structure checked. See proofreading.
A Year 1 Roman Law essay and a Master of Advocacy procedure question need very different help. Pick your course.
Essay-heavy module? See essay writing service.
Help With My LL.B. AssignmentDissertation year? See dissertation writing services.
Help With My Final-Year WorkResearch-heavy? See research paper writing or thesis writing help.
Help With My LL.M. WorkPresenting too? See PowerPoint presentation help.
Help With My DiplomaMalta mixes a civil-law code, English-influenced public and commercial law, and EU law. Knowing which one governs is half the answer.
English cases are persuasive at best here.
English authority can help — cited as persuasive, not binding.
EU law takes priority where it applies.
Using an English case where the Maltese Civil Code governs is one of the most common reasons law answers lose marks.
OSCOLA was written for English sources. Maltese statutes and judgments need a little extra care.
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 (HL) 580Pinpoint the page where the reasoning is — here, Lord Atkin's neighbour principle.Joined Cases C-6/90 and C-9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357, para 35CJEU judgments are cited to the paragraph, not the page.Civil Code (Cap 16 of the Laws of Malta), art [number]Give the Chapter when the Act is first cited, then your faculty's short form.[Plaintiff] v [Defendant] (Court of Appeal, [date of judgment])Maltese judgments are usually cited by parties, court and date — and many are written in Maltese.AI tools write confident legal prose — and invent authority to support it. Here is what a check of one AI draft found.
Borg v Camilleri [2019] MTCA 44Does not existNo such case or citation format — invented by the AI tool.
Consumer Rights Act 2015, s 9Wrong jurisdictionA UK statute. A Maltese consumer sale falls under the Consumer Affairs Act (Cap 378).
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562, 600Wrong pinpointThe neighbour principle is at page 580.
Francovich, para 35Real & pinpointedKept, with the full OSCOLA citation.
Invented authority can turn a good answer into a misconduct case. Every authority we cite can be opened and checked. Draft flagged for AI? See AI content removal.
Clear from the first message, and honest about what your faculty allows.
Civil, criminal, EU and employment law specialists. Degree certificates and photo ID are checked before anyone joins.
From €42. The price depends on the task, level, length and deadline — and stays fixed once you accept the quote.
↔ Swipe to see the full table
| Assignment Type | Academic Level | Starting From | Typical Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case Note | Diploma / Undergraduate | €42 | 2–4 Days |
| Problem Question (IRAC) | Undergraduate | €52 | 3–5 Days |
| Legal Essay | Undergraduate | €56 | 3–6 Days |
| Statute & Case Law Research | Undergraduate / Master's | €60 | 4–6 Days |
| Comparative / EU Law | Undergraduate / Master's | €72 | 5–8 Days |
| Moot Skeleton Argument | Undergraduate / Master's | €88 | 4–7 Days |
| LL.M. Dissertation Chapter | Master's | €165 | 8–12 Days |
You see the ranked issues before writing starts — included.
Every case and statute real, with pinpoints.
Footnotes and tables of cases and statutes, line by line — included.
Julia's law was right. Her examiner kept asking the same question in the margin: what would the defendant say?
LL.B. Year 2 · University of Malta · 2,000 words · OSCOLA footnotes
Her answer cited the Civil Code correctly and predicted the breach. But the factual summary took two paragraphs, the argument ran one way only, and the footnotes named cases without pinpoints.
The facts were cut to two lines, four issues were ranked by weight, and each issue set out the opposing position before concluding. Every footnote was rebuilt in OSCOLA with pinpoints. The feedback called the answer "balanced and well-supported".
LL.B., LL.M., MCAST and working trainees — initials only, always.
Every order is handled online — wherever you study, train or work.
In English or Maltese — including judgments written in Maltese.
From "how do I answer a problem question?" to "do footnotes count?" — straight answers.
Spot the issues, rank them, then work through each one: the issue, the rule, how it applies to the facts, the other side's best argument, and your conclusion.
Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion — the standard structure for problem questions. We add the counter-argument before each conclusion, which is where most marks sit.
Name the Act and its Chapter, for example Civil Code (Cap 16 of the Laws of Malta), then the article. Maltese judgments are usually cited by parties, court and date.
Yes. Under the Faculty of Laws guidelines, footnotes count towards the limit, and text over the limit is not read.
Usually application. Stating the rule earns little; applying it to the facts and answering the other side is where the marks are.
It often invents cases, uses English or US law where Maltese law applies, and gets pinpoints wrong. Every authority we cite is real and checked.
Yes. Send the question and reading list; within 15 minutes you get the approach, a fixed price and a qualified law expert. From €42.
Maltese law where it governs — the Civil Code, the Criminal Code, subsidiary legislation and local judgments, including those written in Maltese.
Yes: short facts, the ratio pinned down precisely, and its significance analysed rather than described.
Yes: grounds in order, authorities marshalled, and the likely bench questions prepared with answers.
Yes, from the proposal to individual chapters, with OSCOLA throughout.
Whichever your module teaches. Send an example and it is followed exactly.
From €42 for a case note, €52 for a problem question, €56 for a legal essay and €165 for an LL.M. dissertation chapter.
Written from scratch, completed, re-argued or reviewed — send your question and reading list and get a fixed price and your law expert within 15 minutes.
Free Turnitin & AI reports · Issue list approved first · 100% confidential · 35% off with MALTA35